Out of all the G7 nations Britain is the only one that spends 0.7% on foreign aid, even more then France and Italy combined

It is truly shocking that the UK is the only G7 nation that’s foreign aid budget hits the 0.7% GDP target, as the economy grows the foreign aid increased to £14 billion a year.

It’s crazy to think Britain’s mammoth £13.9 billion foreign aid bill totals more then France and Italy’s foreign aid expenditure put together. Italy only spent around £4.5 billion and France spent £8.8 billion, in total France and Italy spend £13.3 foreign aid whilst the UK’s seems to have no limit.

Japan spends around 8.9 billion on foreign aid, Canada spent roughly 3.3 billion, even Germany spends 0.66% of their GDP on foreign aid.

Whilst the government hands down cuts to the police, homelessness and poverty are at an all time high and our NHS struggles to survive it’s own crisis. Our government decides it’s a good idea hand away vital tax payers money places like India with it’s own space programme.

British taxpayers money should be prioritised on vital services in Britain that need funding.

© BNN News.

We are not living in normal times

We do not live in normal times.The 70’s and 80’s  generation,especially men,face a number of strange new challenges from various sources-feminism, Islam, black power, the domination of the political scene by the forces of cultural marxism(due to the rise of the previous three factors) to name but a few.In recent years the ‘Conservative Pary”(a misnomer,nowadays, if ever there was one) has gone on a strange journey towards a cultural marxist destination and away from its conservative roots.This is typified by the call,not so long ago,from a CONSERVATIVE,for people to disinherit the 70’s and 80’s generation and leave their property and goods to the generation after them.And this person explained their views with the alarmingly left-liberal phraiseology that this would ’empower’ them(which shows the extent that the Conservative Party has been penetrated by cultural marxist ideology).

Consequently,as the 70’s and 80’s generation has all this to contend with,normal riules of engagement are suspended and we can’t be expected to conduct ourselves by the same old rules as under the previously prevailing conditions.We have to protect ourselves from the attacks of the left.If nobody else is playing by the normal previous rules,we can’t be expected to continue to observe these previous rules.

The Good Friday Agreement was a tawdry capitulation to terrorism and we should stop pretending otherwise

This article is nonsense.The Good Friday Agrement was a tawdry,highly conditional,surrender to Irish terrorism and represented the STRATEGIC victory of the IRA over the British Army.I’m NOT saying the British Army was militarily defeated,I’m saying that decades of first the Fenians in the Nineteenth Century,then the Official IRA then the Provisionals from the late 1960’s at last succeeded in their policy of persuading the British state to disengage from NI by a process of constantly jabbing away at her until the cumulative effect was that they would sign
virtually any agreement in order to get rid of the N I Troubles problem.The peace GFA brought was welcomed by all sides,UNDOUBTEDLY,but looking at the current low point that the GFA and devolution has brought to Ulster,with the Nationalists gaining the ascendency in Stormont and who will soon be in a position,under protocols attached to GVA,to begin calling one poll on re-unification after another until they get the result they want,I severely doubt that it could be judged worthwhile.NORTHERN IRELAND WAKE UP,YOU ARE SLEEPWALKING INTO RE-UNIFICATION.

https://www.independent.co.uk/…/good-friday-agreement-what-…

 

 

© 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

Nations around the globe start expelling Russian diplomats after nerve agent attack in Salisbury

Four EU-member states have expelled Russian diplomats,the United States and even Canada. A few other nations are also starting to expel Russian diplomats after Putin’s Russia have been mostly blamed for the nerve agent attack in Salisbury.

The Germans are chucking out four diplomats, the US is shockingly getting rid of sixty diplomats, Ukraine are even expelling four. The list keeps growing…

Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Canada and the Czech’s are reportedly chucking some out, alongside others.

This near universal response to the Salisbury nerve agent attack clearly show’s the majority of countries around the world believe British Prime Minister Theresa May’s tale that Putin’s Russia is to blame for the death of the former spy Sergei Skripol, and his daughter alongside a British police officer that were exposed to the nerve agent.

Lars Løkke Rasmussen,the Danish Prime Minister has attacked Russia on Twitter, blamed Russia for the nerve agent attack, expelled two Russian diplomats and called it a: ” Joint European response.”

 

© 2018 Patriotic People’s Populist Media.

Devolution and independence-lies and deception from everybody since the beginning

Britain is being continuously lied to about the whole process of constitutional change.At the beginning,in the late 1990’s,the government of Blair assured us time and time again that devolution would be ‘an event’ (IE a one off happening) and not a process, or more or less continuous series of changes.The Scots,Welsh and the Province of Northern Ireland would get a parliament/assembly with devolved powers but this would be ‘within the UK’ and the House of Commons would retain responsibility for major issues (finance, foreign policy,the army ETC).

This hasn’t been adhered to.Over the years subsequent to devolution all the devolved bodies,but especially the Scottish parliament (and to a significant but lesser degree,the Northern Ireland Assembly) have slowly but surely accrued more and more new powers to themselves until we get to the current position where the Scottish parliament will have the highest degree of devolved autonomy that exists anywhere in the world (after the latest Scotland Bill comes into force).

We shouldn’t be surprised at this as Tam Dalyell predicted this happening back in the 1970’s during House of Commons debates on an earlier,similarly mad,attempt at devolution.Tam was a proud Scotsman who often fiercely and intelligently fought for Scotland’s interests in the Commons against all (especially English MP’s) who took Scotland for granted or who treated her unfairly and/or patronisingly, much to the chagrin of those people guilty of such actions.He fought Scotland’s corner in the Commons with great pugnacity and intelligence. However he realized that blinkered nationalism would lead Scotland into disaster.He also realized that Scotland’s best interests lay in maintaining the Union.He dismissed devolution as ‘…a one-way highway to independence with no roundabouts or turnoffs’.In his later years he criticized devolution as unworkable as it is in the nature of devolved assemblies to continuously attract more power to themselves,ending in the demand for independence.And look how true that turned out to be.

During the debate in Parliament in the mid-late 70’s on devolution Tam attacked devolution as unworkable as he thought that two parliaments in one country would simply lead to conflict over who controls what.Having two parliaments in a unitary country leads to the devolved region breaking away from the other part of the country as the two provinces can’t agree on who controls what and as the devolved region accrued more and more powers to itself it gains the (often false) impression that it can go it alone-it seeks independence.Again, recent experience has proved him right.

The Scottish independence question has been beset with lies and distortions from all sides.The SNP simply told (and continues to tell) one bold face lie after another in order to bamboozle Scots into voting for independence.It’s now obvious that they did this because they had no concrete policies for the post-referendum period if they won.Vague promises built on sand were all they offered (with a good dose of extremely unpleasant anti-English rhetoric).Luckily the sensible Scots saw through their mad plans.

But even the ‘unionists’ have misled us. Cameron’s ‘Conservatives’ weren’t really unionists and indeed actually believed that it would be good for Scotland to leave the Union,as this would mean that they would rule the rump UK in perpetuity as they could easily get a substantial majority in the Commons if Labour voting Scotland is removed from the electoral equation.His successor Theresa May is no different,and,whilst saying publicly that she doesn’t think that a second Scottish independence referendum is needed,has made no firm commitment to the Union and gives the impression that she would not defend it if Sturgeon started banging the independence drum again.She is cut from the same patrician cloth as Cameron and would simply cave in to the SNP’s demands for another referendum.What’s more, even though she didn’t have to,she would respect the result.She can’t be trusted to maintain the Union.Corbyn’s neo-Trotskyite Labour Party is indifferent towards the Union and this is highlighted by his assertion that ‘…I am not a unionist’.

The so-called ‘Conservative and Unionist Party’ are the worst of them all.Before the 2014 Scottish independence referendum Cameron promised that a ‘no’ vote would settle the question ‘for a generation'(25-30 years?).He asserted repeatedly that this was a ‘one off deal’ and that this didn’t set a precedent that would enable future referenda to be held.After the nearly 2-1 ‘no’ vote he re-asserted this.He called the vote ‘decisive’.Then,in order to frighten people into voting for staying in the EU he brought up the bogeyman of a second Scottish independence referendum if we left.Sheer scare-mongering and hypocrisy.

He knows he has the legal power (from both the original devolution Acts and the Smith Commission Report recommendations) to rule out a second Scottish referendum.It is perfectly clear from both the original devolution Bill and the later Smith Commission that the House of Commons retains full jurisdiction over constitutional matters,including the calling of referenda,not Holyrood.All this threatening of a second Scots referendum vividly displays the Conservatives real lack of honesty about the constitutional change issue-they have no real intention of sticking to Cameron’s original ‘one off deal’ pledge and will simply cave in to future demands for referenda from the SNP.Their misplaced patrician gentlemanliness means that even though they have the legal right to they won’t deny the Scots future referenda if they ask.They can’t be trusted on this issue.

We have been continuously lied to and misled from day one about constitutional change by everybody involved in the process and their deceit will lead the UK to ruin,unless we stop them.

© 2018 Patriotic People’s Populist Media.

YouGov Poll: 48% Support Compulsory Military Service, 36% Oppose

A brand-new YouGov poll revealed 48% of people that voted in the poll supporting bringing back compulsory military service in the UK are against it. And 36% are opposed to it.

This comes after a Westmonster poll about the exact same thing and 55% backed national service in the UK.

After French President, Emmanuel Macron declared that he is bring back compulsory national service for women and men. They will have to serve a month in the army to receive “a direct experience of military life with its know-how and demands”.

The French president believes it will enhance patriotism and social cohesion.

Strangely, more women than men support it.  50% to 45%.

supporters and members from Conservatives and the UKIP are the most supportive of compulsory national service, and  66% and 82% come out in favour of it. In regards to Labour supporters 36% support it,  and 49% against it, 42% of Liberal Democrats support it, 45% oppose it.

 

Renew Party: New British Political Party Hell-Bent On Reversing Brexit And Being Similar To Macron’s En Marche!

There is a brand new political party in the UK which is hell-bent on reversing Brexit, reducing supposed inequality and becoming a re-branded En Marche. They are in the process of preparing to hold events in towns, cities and universities in the UK.

 

The new Euro-fanatic party ‘Renew’ has a so-called   “people-centred” approach which is somewhat similar Emmanuel Macron’s La République En Marche! and some would say it’s what secured him his victory.  This is not the only thing that makes these two parties similar. Renew claims to be at the centre ground of British politics and Macron claims the same in France.

 

The illiberal Renew party that wants to reverse the referendum that saw 17.4 million people vote for Brexit has somehow secured well over 200 candidates for local and national elections. Their first political battle will come in May in the London and English council election.

 

En Marche political figures will attend the events in London with Renew Party to give them advice and offer them support in becoming a mainstream political party.

 Renew Party – Core Idea https://renewbritain.org/core-ideas/

Stop Brexit – a second referendum 

Our country is divided by the EU referendum because many people feel they were lied to.

We believe a second referendum is overwhelmingly in the interests of both Brexit and Remain supporters. This referendum would be on the final deal negotiated with the EU, so the country can vote on the reality of Brexit and come to an informed decision.

With a hung parliament, an election could happen at any time. We will put pressure on all politicians to offer a second referendum by standing parliamentary candidates in every constituency in the UK.

 

The illiberal Renew Party seeks to become a haven for disenfranchised culture-less people from the younger generation who supposedly feel “politically homeless” after the result of the EU referendum and they supposedly feel they are an alternative to traditional political parties because Ms Khadouri stated they are “weak, divided and out of touch”.

 

Renew is apparently crowd funded but also supported by a single donor but I wonder how long it will be until the EU or George Soros hands them some cash?

 

The United Kingdom does not need any more EU-loving political parties we already have the three main traditional parties plagued with remoaners calling for a second-referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU. To me it looks like a scheme developed by Macron, the EU and the Euro-fanatics in the UK to aide the reversal of Brexit and give the remoaners a fake grass-roots party that doesn’t resemble a globalist movement.

 

Renew will not help the working-class or working-class communities.

 

 

 

© 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.