Theresa May’s government survive vote of no confidence

Labour Party Leader, Jeremy Corbyn motioned the vote of confidence against May’s government, it did not succeed. 

 

 

325 British MPs voted for the government, and 306 lawmakers voted against the government. Winning by a majority of 19 MPs. 

 

 

Back in December 2019, Tory Prime Minister Theresa May’s own party triggered a vote of no confidence against her. 

 

 

This attempt to topple the government comes straight after the House of Commons rejected Prime Minister Theresa May’s by a historic margin, 423 voting against the deal, and 202 voting for the Withdrawal Agreement. 118 Conservative Party MPs voted against May’s so-called deal, her party is divided between pro-EU and pro-Brexit factions.

 

 

The UK government must enact the wills and wishes of the 17.4 million Brits that voted for Brexit. With or without a deal on 29 March, the United Kingdom must withdraw from the European Union. 

 

 

 

 

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

© 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK

Controversial French President Emmanuel Macron absurdly claims: “Nationalism is a Betrayal of Patriotism”

Emmanuel Macron bizarrely said “nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism.” Just a few weeks after US President Donald J. Trump confidently claimed “I’m a nationalist.”

 

 

Macron has previously called for a “Real European army” to apparently protect ourselves American aggression, alongside a few other things. Emmanuel reportedly has a 70% disapproval rate in France, in a French poll. 

 

 

The French President also claimed “old demons are rising again”, while he welcomed the US President to France for Armistice marking the 100th anniversary of World War One. 

 

 

 

 

He also claimed “Patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism.” Which if you know anything about political philosophy, is completely absurd.  Nationalism is synonym of patriotism, nationalism is the belief of the promotion of your nation state, especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining sovereignty (self-governance) over the homeland. 

 

 

Is Macron attempting to pit EU member-states against one of our oldest and most trusted allies? The European Union is playing a very dangerous and unfair game with the US, even some EU Commissioner Günther Oettinger from Germany branding Donald Trump an “autocrat.” Brussels will make any excuse and use any scapegoat they can to fulfil their dream of an army that swears allegiance to the European Union. 

 

 

 

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

 

 

 

 © 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

The EU has revealed its true nature: a federalist monster that will not stop until nations are abolished

It was always the aim of the European project, from its very inception in 1951 with the Treaty of Paris, signed on 18th April 1951 between Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, France, Italy and West Germany to established the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) (which is traditionally regarded as the foundation of the EU because it led to political and economic integration to a certain degree in western Europe as well as providing the basis for the modern EU) and the March 25th 1957 signing of the Treaty of Rome to establish a fully integrated federal superstate called the United States of Europe in which the concept of individual national sovereignty for each member state is complexly destroyed and Europe becomes a single , centralised political entity ruled from Brussels. Ted Heath knew this full well when he conned the UK public into voting for entry into the then European Economic Community, supposedly just a free trading bloc and nothing else. He had been briefed by the Civil Service that membership would entail the eventual complete loss of the UK’s sovereignty and our eventual absorption into a European superstate. We were sold the European project on a tissue of lies (note well please, Anna Soubry.)

This deception continued in subsequent decades with politicians of all parties and political shades signing the UK up to various stages of integration into the EU.

The Premiership of Margaret Thatcher (1979-1990) was, perhaps, the one notable exception. She negotiated a rebate for the UK on its financial contributions to the EEC (as it still was at that time) and generally resisted moves by European politicians to centralise power in Brussels. In 1988 there came the ‘Bruges speech’, often known by the alternative epithet of the ‘No, No, No’ speech after a line taken from it. In this speech she asserted:

‘We have not successfully rolled back the frontiers of the state in Britain, only to see them re-imposed at a European level, with a European super-state exercising a new dominance from Brussels.’

It pleased the Eurosceptic wing of the Conservative Party but dismayed the Europhiles.

However, even she was guilty of aiding European integration. She signed the Single European Act (1986). a treaty that was signed between 12 members of the EEC snd which revised the Treaty of Rome and provided the basis for foundation of the single market. It also formalised the European Political Cooperation Agreement, the precursor of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy.

This came against a backdrop of a government split over whether to join the Exchange Rate Mechanism, which harmonised the exchange rate between the currencies of Europe and was supposed to be a precursor to the establishment of the single currency, the Euro, which Thatcher eventually agreed to do in October 1990.

Whilst nominally a Eurosceptic, Thatcher’s successor John Major (Prime Minister 1990-1997) displayed an increasing pro-European tendency as his Premiership progressed. He signed the UK up to the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, after which the EEC (often abbreviated to just EC, the European Community) officially became the European Union.

The New Labour period of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown (1997-2010) witnessed a massive transfer of various powers from the EU to Brussels as the cravenly pro-EU Labour elite sought to aid the creation of a European superstate. They signed over great swathes of the UK’s sovereignty to Brussels in treaties such as those of Amsterdam (1997), Nice (2001) and Lisbon (2007). They were extremely enthusiastic about the single currency, the Euro, but didn’t get round to completing that before losing power to David Cameron in 2010.

Cameron’s (and Theresa May’s from 2016) Premiership (2010-present) saw the continuation of New Labour’s very Europhile approach to relations with the EU (and indeed a continuation of New Labour’s left-liberal policies generally.) Cameron continued to keep the UK tied closely to the EU, and he handed over substantial chunks of the UK’s sovereignty to Brussels, before agreeing to a referendum on our membership of the EU after having failed to re-negotiate the terms of our membership with the bloc. He backed Remain, but the country backed Leave, and he resigned as PM, to be succeeded by Theresa May. May was just as much an arch Remainer as Cameron and indeed was probably parachuted into the Premiership by the Remainers in the Conservative Party in order to attempt to sabotage Brexit (she’s been doing a good job of doing that so far.)

The UK public, which has expressed its desire to remain a sovereign nation on several occasions, most notably in the 2016 referendum , has been lied to and covertly forced into the EU superstate by the political and intellectual elite of all political persuasions for a very long time now. The time for complacency is over. If we let the politicians and their allies in the intelligentsia handle matters, we will be betrayed and effectively kept in the EU. The democratic majority must make their voice heard and stand up for what they want-a fully sovereign UK completely free of the EU superstate.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/07/the-eu-has-revealed-its-true-nature-a-federalist-monster-that-wi/

© 2018 British News Network.

Tommy Robinson blasts mainstream media establishment for portraying his views as “far right” without any evidence to substantiate their claims

Tommy Robinson has claimed that mainstream media outlets are branding him “far-right” without any evidence and has claimed if the “silver spoon” journalists studied and researched Islamic scripture and about their prophet they would agree with him.   

 

Recently Sky News reportedly took down an interview over claims they were “spreading false headlines across the world” in the words of Tommy Robinson. 

 

The journalist and political activist Tommy Robinson also said: “Islam is not a race and it is more than a religion, it is a political ideology.” Is there merit to Mr. Robinson’s words? Across the globe many hard-line Islamic states use the literal interpenetration of Islam and Shariah Law to institute the total domination of Islam. 

 

Is Islam compatible with Western-style democracy?

 

Islam was developed in the Middle and Dark ages, the political philosophy generally imitates tremendously authoritarian regimes.   

 

Theologically, the structure is usually based on hierarchy with absolute authority to god, there is no separation between mosque and state. Religion undeniably plays a pivotal role in politics in Islamic countries.    

 

Undeniably, Islam is not structurally, politically or even culturally compatible with any kind of democracy. Never mind Western-style democracy.    

 

Tommy Robinson’s official Facebook account: 

 

“There is a coordinated effort by all the fake news media outlets to somehow brand my views as far right without supplying any evidence for their claim. The Army issued statement about not aligning with far-right ideology again implying I am far right.”

“Islam is not a race and it is more than a religion, it is a political ideology. I have issues with elements within that ideology that are homophobic, misogynist, violent and impose restrictions on freedom of choice and freedom of speech. There is no other scripture in Britain in 2018 where people follow the scripture literally and commit terrorism or mass murder.”

“I have fairly central views, have not mentioned race in any form in over 10 years of activism. You can criticise any other religion or political ideology in the world freely but if you rightly call out issues within Islam there is this establishment campaign to call you ‘far right’. Its as though because this particular ideology originates in the middle east then you are not allowed to criticise it??”

“If any of you Fake news silver spoon journalists actually studied and researched Islamic scripture and the life of Mohammed you would end up agreeing with me instead of being so ignorant and virtue signalling at every opportunity.”

“People see through this establishment ploy. Together we are stronger.”

 

Whether you love or loathe Tommy Robinson his right to free-speech should not be diminished for simply having views on a religion/ideology that is not even compatible with the the law of the land or the Western-style democracy we are governed by.   

 

 

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

 

 

 © 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

Bill Etheridge MEP quits UKIP and joins the Libertarian Party four days later

Controversial MEP Bill Etheridge quit UKIP over criticisms and concerns he had over Gerrard Batten’s  leadership and decided to join the Libertarian Party just four days later. He now serves as the parties deputy chairman. 

 

Etheridge has been at odds with Gerrard Batten and new populist direction UKIP is taking, he describes himself as a natural libertarian and believes that UKIP under Batten’s leadership is moving away from those values that are listed in the party constitution. 

 

Bill, has also been very critical on Gerrard Batten’s new stance in regards Islam which he describes as: “attacking an entire religion as if everyone who believes in it is the same.”

 

Bill Etheridge wrote article on Westmonster detailing his reasons for leaving UKIP and joining the Libertarian Party:

“I resigned from UKIP on Tuesday and joined the UK Libertarian Party four days later.  As far as I am concerned, I switched labels but remained true to my beliefs – for UKIP has left me, not the other way around.”

“In its constitution in 2010, UKIP declares itself a libertarian party.  That constitution is still in force.  However, you would not know it from a UKIP Leader advocating state ownership and control – which has to be paid for with higher taxes – and attacking an entire religion as if everyone who believes in it is the same.  How can hundreds of millions of people all be regarded as identical in their beliefs – subscribing to what he calls a ‘death cult’?  That is absurd.”

“Therefore, I decided I had to switch to a real libertarian party, which fits principles held my entire adult life.  Where to go?”

2In my office are photos of Churchill and Margaret Thatcher.  If the Conservative Party was remotely the party of these political giants, I might still be in it. But we, the electorate, face a choice between Corbynite Marxism and pastel pink Maybot social democracy also advocating more regulation and taxation – but just not as much as Corbyn.”

Bill, also claimed: “I have joined a party which may be small but stands for what I have always stood for – and which I believe Thatcher and Churchill stood for too.”

 

 

Libertarian Party leader, Adam Brown had this to say about Bill Etheridge joining the Party:

“We are delighted to have Bill join us. We often speak to members of other parties who consider themselves Libertarian and have become increasingly dissatisfied with politics within these parties and are defecting to us.

“It is great to be able to give this Libertarian a voice in our party and we welcome those from other parties, who consider themselves Libertarians, to do the same.”

 

Bill Etheridge was once a councillor in Dudley and even stood for Police & Crime Commissioner, he contested local council elections four times, he won back in 2014, and has stood for parliamentary elections twice.

 

Libertarian Party Chairman, Andrew Withers also spoke out on Bill joining the party:

“I see this move as a sea change in our profile and welcome Bill’s campaigning expertise and also thank him for his hospitality in Brussels last month.

“The Libertarian Party advocate a written constitution similar to that of Switzerland, where state control ends and the rights and responsibilities of citizens begin.”

 

Bill Etheridge is certainly not on-board with UKIP on many issues, he even released a press statement denouncing Boris Johnson’s comments on the Burka.

 

I think Bill Etheridge leaving UKIP will be seen as something that is long overdue by many party members and supporters. He has led an extremely controversial tenure as an active political figure within the UKIP establishment even going as far as to deny party orders and visit Crimea which is of course occupied by Russia.

 

 

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

 

 

 © 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

The Islamisation of the UK’s prisons

The Reverend Paul Song came to the UK from South Korea twenty five years ago.

He became a chaplain in Brixton Prison in South London, teaching the inmates the Alpha Course, a guide to living the Christian life in modern Britain.

At first, his tenure went well and he helped many inmates reform themselves and become model citizens.

However, this situation changed with the appointment of a new head chaplain at the prison, a Muslim Imam.

This new head of religion at the prison took Paul into his office and declared his Islamising agenda, saying he wanted to

change what he described as the ‘Christian domination’ in the prison.

Over the following months, Paul and his fellow Christian chaplains were to undergo a severe trial of bullying, intimidation and even physical violence.

He was subjected to:

– Regular noisy interruption of his services with Muslim inmates shouting abuse like ‘Chinky’ and ‘crazy Christian’ at him aand even voicing support for violent Jihadism, including the killers of Lee Rigby.

– Constant attempts to convert him to Islam using intimidating verbal tactics.

– Physical violence, even from the Imam himself, who used his substantial physical bulk to intimidate Paul and once pushed him out of the way. Another Muslim innate also shoved Paul in the back in one such incident.

– All this verbal and physical abuse became too much for Paul’s fellow chaplains, who suffered in the same way as Paul and many of them left.

Paul had more staying power (he’d been a detective in Korea and wasn’t so east to force out) and he stuck it out. The head Imam continued his persecution of Paul.

Matters came to a head when the Imam called Paul into his office and banned him from preaching his Christian course as it was ‘too radical’, even though the Alpha course is taught at churches throughout the UK.

Reluctantly, Paul agreed, though he knew that he wasn’t an extremist of any kind. The Imam’s persecution continued and eventually Paul was sacked on false charges of calling an inmate a terrorist.

Responding to the above, a Prison Service spokesman said: ‘There is absolutely no evidence to support claims relating to extremist behaviour at HMP Brixton.’ So what about Paul’s evidence?

Paul has been re-instated after an appeal and the imam has been dismissed on matters unrelated to Push’s case, but he is understandably disappointed and perplexed by the whole affair.

Paul is now planning to restart his courses. ‘This has been a very difficult time,’ he said. ‘Not for a moment did I think that something like this could happen in England.’

Sadly, ‘something like this’ goes on all the time now in England, in many areas of life.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6172019/Prison-chaplain-tells-terrorised-extremist-inmates-backed-ISIS.html

© 2018 British Network News.

Under Theresa May’s Chequers Plan, a post Brexit UK will become like Vichy France

After the defeat of France by Nazi forces in 1940, an armistice was signed between Germany and France. Paul Reynauld resigned as Prime Minister of the French government and was replaced by the aged Marshall Philippe Petain (who was even older than Churchill.) Petain was a popular figure and hero of the Great War-he had single handedly prevented the collapse of the French army in 1916 when it looked like the German onslaught would finally succeed and was perceived as being quite charismatic and a bit of a womaniser. He was an advocate of ending the war and seeking a peace settlement with the Germans. He was voted in as PM by the French cabinet and immediately sought and secured an armistice and surrendered to the Germans. As part of this peace settlement the Germans occupied only certain parts of Northern France, Paris and certain areas of the West coast (in order to gain access to the ports to base submarines there to harry UK shipping). There was also a fairly large ‘free zone’ in the South, which was not occupied by the Germans and was headed by Petain and Pierre Laval based in the spa town of Vichy-Vichy France.

Vichy France was, in theory, an independent country. It’s government could, in theory, decide its own policies on any matter. In reality, it was merely a vassal state of the German Reich that more or less automatically aligned its policies with those of Germany anyway.

This is the situation that would pertain under Theresa May’s Chequers Plan. It would turn the UK into a version of Vichy France- a vassal state of the EU that is technically independent of the bloc but in reality is informally subservient to it and that has its policies on many issues decided in Brussels with Theresa ‘Marshall Petain’ May complying with her master’s wishes by aligning the UK’s policies to those of the EU anyway automatically.

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

 © 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

Unemployment in the UK drops by 55,000, lowest it has been since 1975

According to ONS figures unemployment in the UK since July has dropped by 55,000. 

 

Back in July there were reportedly 1.36 millions British people unemployed meaning that overall unemployment fell to just 4%. 

 

 

The brand new figures symbolize a Brexit boom to the British economy, unemployment is at it’s lowest it has been since  December 1974 to February 1975.

 

There have also been a record breaking number of vacancies available. There were around 833,000 jobs advertised in the months between June to August 2018.

 

 

Do you remember when the Euro-fanatics claimed that unemployment would surge by around 500,000 after the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union? The new statistics and common-sense yet again prove the remainers to be very deceptive and dishonest. 

 

Project Fear is still alive and well. But the truth and facts are out there for everyone to see even if the mainstream media and Pro-EU establishment tell you different. 

 

 

TO HELP US ACHIEVE OUR AIMS AND OBJECTIVES YOU CAN DONATE TO BNN NEWS VIA OUR PAYPAL PAGE; PAYPAL.ME/PPPM

 

 

 

 © 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

Former UKIP Leader Farage is a key speaker at a DUP ‘Brexit and Beyond’ event in Northern Ireland

Arguably the man that made Brexit happen, Nigel Farage MEP attended and shared a platform with key people from the Democratic Unionist Party the main Unionist party in Northern Ireland that is in a  confidence-and-supply agreement with Theresa May’s Conservative minority government. A sizeable group gathered to welcome Nigel Farage and Aaron Bank’s the so called “Bad-boys of Brexit.”

 

Many DUP MP’s attended the event including figures like Sammy Wilson.

Also Democratic Unionist Party MP, Ian Paisley was in attendance.

https://twitter.com/ianpaisleymp/status/994889539104763905

Andy Wigmore and Aaron Banks were also very much present and noticeable at the event.

Even Nigel Farage himself personally tweeted; “What a great evening last night with my friends.”

Is this simply a event to celebrate Brexit and talk about Britain’s future outside the European Union? Or is it the gradual process of Farage garnering support among key figures in the DUP and Northern Ireland to potentially stand as a candidate in the future? Either way, it looked like a top night!

 

 

© 2018 BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE ARTICLES PRINTED HERE DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE EDITORS OR OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK. NO PART OF THE BRITISH NEWS NETWORK OR ANY OF ITS CONTENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED, COPIED OR MODIFIED, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BRITISH NEWS NETWORK.

BBC have announced they will broadcast Enoch Powell’s controversial so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech, unsurprisingly biased lefties call for it to be cancelled

There has been an announcement that the BBC will air Enoch Powell the former Conservative & Ulster Unionist MP, and former Minister of Health so called “Rivers of Blood” speech on Saturday on Radio 4 in full.

Apparently the speech will be voiced by Ian McDiarmid an actor, it will reportedly be broken into parts with commentators debating things that Enoch Powell said.

The actor playing Enoch Powell, Ian McDiarmid said; ‘Enoch Powell was no racist.’ but the Labour MP for Dudley North responded by saying; “I think Enoch Powell was completely wrong and knew exactly what he was doing.” and added;  “wrong to claim he wasn’t a racist. Completely wrong”.

To nobodies surprise lefties have been demanding the speech which will be aired is cancelled, The Guardian authored an article called: “The BBC must withdraw its dangerous Rivers of Blood broadcast”

This is the freedom of speech and people should be free to listen to what they like, whether you agreed with Enoch Powell’s policies or not, liked or disliked his speeches he was a phenomenal figure that was household name and still is, he has and had a right to to exercise his right to free-speech and people certainly have the right to like, dislike, commentate and critique on it… Or do they?

 © 2018 Patriotic People’s Populist Media.